21 May 2017 4:02 pm
Massive difference between Clinton's second foundation and Ivanka's proposed foundations. Clinton's had absolute control while Ivanka's proposed foundations would be under control of independent people not related to the Trumps. The Clinton financial doings are tainted by accusations of corruption while Ivanka's proposed ones are independant of the Trumps. When Billy Graham was starting out there was found to be fraud with donated money of some Evangelical preachers. His father-in-law gave him the advice to set up a foundation that he would only receive a salary and expenses rrom. Because of this his reputation is unblemished. This was a failure of the Clintons. They controlled the one foundation.Misty » 21 May 2017 3:31 pm » wrote: I'm sure that none of these countries or corporations will donate money to Ivanka's foundation slush fund to curry favor with the POTUS.[/sarcasm]
If the Clintons were in the WH right now, and they did half the stuff the Trump's are doing, you would be screaming bloody murder, and you know it, so don't even try to lie about it.